On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:44:12AM -0700, ***@bennettconstruction.us wrote:
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: What would you like to see in upcoming PF tutorials?
> > From: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <***@bsdly.net>
> > Date: Thu, December 14, 2017 2:27 pm
> > To: ***@openbsd.org
> > We're in the process of preparing for upcoming conferences with updates
> > to the ever-in-progress PF tutorial.
> > If you have thoughts on what you would like to see in a tutorial session
> > and would like to share them either with me or the list, we would love
> > to hear from you.
> > The slides from last year's session at BSDCan can be found here:
> > https://home.nuug.no/~peter/pftutorial/ - we're basically looking
> > for ways to make those sessions more useful (the last one wasn't
> > awful we hear, but there's always room for improvement).
> > - Peter
> > --
> > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
> > http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
> > "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
> > delilah spamd: 220.127.116.11: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
> I have to admit that I simply cannot follow the pf
> guide at this point.
> When I started using OpenBSD, I had no problems with
> getting spamd and NAT to work. The guide uses variables instead of
> example IP addresses and I get
> confused which computer is inside, outside, etc.
> I would really like something that makes it clear which connection is
> All of my recent attempts at NAT have just failed to work.
> Spamd was working fine, but it stopped working completely.
> It would also be nice to know if anything can't work and why.
> This might be helpful for presentations, but I
> sure would like it for the online guide.
> Chris Bennett
I would like to see more indepth discussion of queues, anchors, and
authpf. I suspect either of the three could probably fill an entire pf